The first is run by a group of well-intentioned executives who have a good understanding of their business. They are mostly honest but lack high levels of trust and are sometimes guarded in their feedback and ideas. They may hold back in robust conversations and feel nervous calling out poor performance. Disunity is often prevalent outside of team meetings which results in factions under the surface. Sometimes, instead of committing to the organization’s priorities, they may choose to follow what’s perceived to be their own better ideas.

 

The second is led by a leadership team whose members are open with one another, passionately debate important issues, and commit to clear decisions, even if they initially disagree. They call each other out when their behaviors or performance needs correction, and they focus their attention on the collective good of the organization.

​

We believe that organizations like the second one will surpass any mediocre organization through its ability to lead cohesively. Cohesive leadership teams not only create a massive competitive advantage and improved bottom line, they also transform the culture and so, make a real difference in the lives of the people who work there.